Skip to main content

Audit sampling 审计抽样

 

Audit sampling 审计抽样


Audit sampling is the application of audit procedures to less than 100% of items within a population of audit relevance such that all sampling units have a chance of selection in order to provide the auditor with a reasonable basis on which to draw conclusions about the entire population.

审计抽样是指注册会计师对具有审计相关性的总体中低于百分之百的项目实施的审计程序,使得所有抽样单元都有被选取的机会,为注册会计师针对整个总体得出结论提供合理基础。

The population is the entire set of data from which a sample is selected and about which the auditor wishes to draw conclusions.


Sampling risk is the risk that the auditor's conclusion based on a sample may be different from the conclusion that would be reached if the entire population were subjected to the same audit procedure. Sampling risk can lead to two types of erroneous conclusions:

(i) In the case of a test of controls, that controls are more effective than they actually are, or in the case of a test of details, that a material misstatement does not exist when in fact it does. The auditor is primarily concerned with this type of erroneous conclusion because it affects audit effectiveness and is more likely to lead to an inappropriate audit opinion.

(ii) In the case of a test of controls, that controls are less effective than they actually are, or in the case of a test of details, that a material misstatement exists when in fact it does not. This type of erroneous conclusion affects audit efficiency as it would usually lead to additional work to establish that initial conclusions were incorrect.

抽样风险是指注册会计师根据样本得出的结论,可能不同于如果对整个总体实施与样本相同的审计程序得出的结论的风险。

Non-sampling risk is the risk that the auditor reaches an erroneous conclusion for any reason not related to sampling risk.

非抽样风险是指注册会计师由于任何与抽样风险无关的原因而得出错误结论的风险。

Sampling unit is the individual items constituting a population.


Stratification is the process of dividing a population into sub-populations, each of which is a group of sampling units which have similar characteristics, often monetary value.


An anomaly is a misstatement or deviation that is demonstrably not representative of misstatements or deviations in a population.


Tolerable misstatement is a monetary amount set by the auditor in respect of which the auditor seeks to obtain an appropriate level of assurance that the monetary amount set by the auditor is not exceeded by the actual misstatement in the population.


Tolerable rate of deviation is a rate of deviation from prescribed internal control procedures set by the auditor in respect of which the auditor seeks to obtain an appropriate level of assurance that the rate of deviation set by the auditor is not exceeded by the actual rate of deviation in the population.


Examples of factors influencing sample size for tests of controls

The extent to which the auditor's risk assessment takes into account relevant controls

The tolerable rate of deviation

The expected rate of deviation of the population to be tested

The auditor's desired level of assurance that the tolerable rate of deviation is not exceeded by the actual rate of deviation in the population

The number of sampling units in the population


Examples of factors influencing sample size for tests of details

The auditor's assessment of the risk of material misstatement

The use of other substantive procedures directed at the same assertion

The auditor's desired level of assurance that tolerable misstatement is not exceeded by actual misstatement in the population

The tolerable misstatement

The amount of misstatement the auditor expects to find in the population

Stratification of the population when appropriate

The number of sampling units in the population



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Advanced Accounting Assignment Help

  Advanced Accounting Assignment Help Objectives We offer advanced financial accounting assignment help for students all over the world. Leasing Foreign currency Employee-benefits Income tax deferred tax assets/liabilities Hedging & derivative Financial instruments Share-based payment Provisions, contingencies Related parties Associates / joint ventures / joint operations Consolidated financial statements goodwill intragroup transactions bonds NCI Changes in direct ownership SPV Special Purpose Vehicle Download Freedom Download Freedom US Securities Laws & SEC Regulations and Rules Download Freedom Business Law The Ethical Global and E Commerce 17 Textbook Solution Manuals Download Freedom Securities Regulation: Cases and Materials Download Freedom Examples & Explanations for Securities Regulation Download Freedom Examples and Explanations Corporations Download Freedom ACCA Download Freedom Advanced Accounting 12th Beams Textbook Solution Manuals(US ISBN-13: 978-0-13-34...

美國聯邦證券法律:簡介

      美國規範證券市場的法規,除聯邦制定的相關規定外,還有各州訂定的證券法令。此外各證券交易所以及證券市場自律組織的規章,在法規領域亦具重大意義。 立法背景       美國聯邦政府於 1933 年前對證券市場的管理法規尚未完備,當時證券市場的管理主要受各州民、刑事法規及各證券交易所的自律規章所規範。此後於 1929 至 1933 年間,股價暴跌約 85% 以上。因股市崩盤過程中,諸多舞弊情事造成重大損失,引起投資大眾極度不安,因此要求控制證券市場的呼聲日起。為重建投資人對證券市場的信心,政府對證券市場的操縱活動進行全面的調查,並於 1933 年、 1934 年分別制定 “1933 年證券法 ” 及 ”1934 年證券交易法 ” 。制定該法目的為:第一,   要求公開向大眾募資的公司,   需向投資人真實反映其營業狀況、其股份出售的情形及投資風險;第二,公平對待每位股東,且以投資人的利益為首要考慮目標。 聯邦證券法律 Securities Act of 1933 1933 年證券法 Securities Exchange Act of 1934 1934 年證券交易法 Trust Indenture Act of 1939 1939 年信託契約法 Investment Company Act of 1940 1940 年投資公司法 Investment Advisers Act of 1940 1940 年投資顧問法 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 薩班斯 · 奧克斯利法案 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and ConsumerProtection Act of 2010 2010 年多德 - 弗蘭克華爾街改革和消費者保護法 Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 2012 年 JOBS“ 約伯斯 ” 法案 Securities and Exchange Commission Rules and Regulations Part 200 Organization: Conduct and Ethics; and Information and R...

AU: Associates and joint ventures

Associates and Joint Ventures 1. What is an associate entity? Paragraph 3 of AASB 128/IAS 28 defines an associate as: • an entity over which the investor has significant influence. The key criterion is the existence of significant influence, also defined in para. 3 defined as: • The power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee but is not control or joint control of those policies. Note that an investor does not have to necessarily hold shares in an associate – yet the application of the equity method depends on such a shareholding. However, refer to the presumptions in para 6 of AASB 128/IAS 28. 2. Why are associates distinguished from other investments held by the investor? The suite of accounting standards provides different levels of disclosure dependent on the relationship between the investor and the investee: • Subsidiaries: a control relationship (AASB 10). • Joint ventures: a joint control relationship (AASB 11). • Associates: a significa...